![]() |
Evergreen
International is the most complete resource for Latter-day Saints on same-sex attraction. |
|
| home | learn about same-sex attraction | support groups | conferences/firesides | articles | newsletters | languages | bookstore | about us | ||
MythsSometimes misinformation is spread by word of mouth or by the news media. This section exists to provide answers to common myths.
Myth: People don't overcome same-sex attraction.
|
| Myth: People don't overcome same-sex attraction. |
|
One common myth is that people don't overcome same-sex
attraction. Some people would like the public to believe that no one really
changes. They claim that individuals who say they have overcome it either
(1) didn't really experience same-sex attraction in the first place or (2)
they are only suppressing their true feelings and will someday realize it.
The truth is that many people find success in overcoming homosexual
behavior, diminishing same-sex attraction, resolving internal conflicts, and
living according to their personal and religious values. For proof of the
many who are successful, read the
testimonies on this Web site, read books
that recount their experiences, or attend the
annual
Evergreen conference. The following information may also be helpful: Just the Facts by David Pruden, Executive Director of Evergreen International
Gay-To-Straight Research Published In APA Journal
Dr. Spitzer recognizes that some people can and do change
Is Sexual Re-orientation Possible? by Warren Throckmorton, PhD
Homosexuality and the Possibility of Change: A Review of 31 Published Studies
|
| Myth: People are born gay. It's all genetic. |
|
Some scientists have intently tried to discover scientific
proof that homosexuality is genetic, and therefore, cannot be changed. Some
studies hint at a biological component, but have not proven that same-sex
attraction is simply caused by genetics, or that such a potential cause
overrules the possibility that people can change such attractions. What Causes Same-sex Attraction? by Jason Park
The Innate-Immutable Argument Finds No Basis in Science: In Their Own Words: Gay Activists Speak About Science, Morality, Philosophy by A. Dean Byrd, Ph.D.; Shirley E. Cox, Ph.D.; and Jeffrey W. Robinson, Ph.D.
|
| Myth: The psychological associations in America denounce trying to change. It is unethical to even try. |
|
Many professional organizations have made statements about
the ineffectiveness and potential damage that can be caused by reparative or
conversion therapy. They claim that the potential risks of such therapy
include depression, anxiety, and self-destructive behavior. The American
Psychological Association's Lesbian, Gay and Bisexual Issues Committee
lobbied for years against the right of individuals to receive treatment for
unwanted same-sex attractions
and have pressured the APA to ban scientists from studying the viability of
gender-affirmative therapy. The Bottom Line: Evergreen does not advocate any particular form of therapy. However, if a client make a personal choice to reject a gay lifestyle and seek any form of therapy for any reason (including religious or spiritual reasons), the ethical implication for any professional is to respect the client’s choice. One of the most efficient ways to ensure that an individual makes a free and voluntary choice within an ethical framework is through advanced informed consent to treatment. As a science that emphasizes the celebration of individual differences, psychological associations and practitioners should preserve the rights of all people–including those with unwanted same-sex attraction–to choose and pursue their own values, lifestyle, and especially, treatment. It is unethical for a
therapist to try to convince a client that he/she should change from
homosexuality to heterosexuality. However, it is equally unethical for a
therapist to tell a client to remain in homosexuality when he/she has
determined that homosexuality does not fit with his/her personal values and
has come to the therapist for help in overcoming it. Ethical therapy is
where the therapist presents alternatives, and lets the client make
decisions for him/herself. Individuals have a right to know that prevention
and effective treatment are available. A variety of studies have shown that
between 25% and 50% of those seeking treatment experienced significant
improvement. Consider the words of the Executive Director of the American Psychological Association, Raymond Fowler: "The APA's position on reparative therapy is that those who wish to explore developing heterosexual feelings or behavior have a right to do so as part of every client's right to self-determination. If an individual is comfortable with homosexuality, it is not the role of the therapist to convince the client otherwise. If one's feelings are ego-dystonic and there is a desire to talk about changing, that is an acceptable choice and a psychologist may participate if he or she desires."
APA Journal Article Says Gender-Affirmative Therapy Should be Available
Psychology Today Editor Says APA Does Not Condemn Change Therapy
Dr. Spitzer recognizes that some people can and do change
Tolerance - APA Discriminates Against Ex-Gays: Robert Spitzer, MD -- From "Gay" to Straight? By Dr. F. Earle Fox
Don't Forsake Homosexuals Who Want Help By Charles Socarides, Benjamin Kaufman, Joseph Nicolosi, Jeffrey Satinover and Richard Fitzgibbons. From Letters to the Editor, The Wall Street Journal, January 9, 1997.
Some Psychologists Say Reparative Therapy is Unethical: Yet Modern Methods are Healing and Client-Centered by Charlotte Rosenak, Ph.D. The Counseling Psychologist, 27 (5), 722-742.
Research Published In APA Journal
Many Professionals Support Clients' Rights for Gender-Affirmative Therapy
Clients Have a Right to Seek Change
|
| Myth: All the efforts to make people change are doing more harm than good. |
|
People sometimes try to discredit the efforts of people who
are changing their lives, saying that the stress and effort to try to change
only tears families apart and causes more harm than good. In reality, their
are thousands of people who improve their lives by resolving their internal
conflicts, so they can live according to their personal values and keep
their families together. Of course, there are those who do not succeed. Some
of these people are vocal and try to convince others that no one is
succeeding. For
proof of the many who are successful, read the
testimonies on this Web site, read books
that recount their experiences, or attend the annual
Evergreen conference. The following information shows the positive
effects in people's lives. While it is true that no one should be coerced into treatment, the reverse is also true that no one should be denied treatment if they want it. Ultimately, it is an issue of personal freedom and self-determination. Psychology Today Editor Defends Gender-Affirmative Therapy
Is Sexual Re-orientation Possible? by Warren Throckmorton, PhD
Some Psychologists Say Reparative Therapy is Unethical: Yet Modern Methods are Healing and Client-Centered by Charlotte Rosenak, Ph.D. The Counseling Psychologist, 27 (5), 722-742.
|
| Myth: Organizations that try to help people to change are failing. |
|
Some people are intent on discrediting the organizations who
help people who want to change. In reality, Evergreen and other
organizations are stronger today than they have ever been. Read the State of
the Organization messages given at Evergreen's
annual conferences. The following articles also provide some interesting
facts. Are Exodus Ministries Flakey? by Bob Davies, Executive Director Exodus International of North America (Exodus is an umbrella organization of Christian ministries around the world)
The Top Five Myths About Ex-Gay Ministry by Bob Davies, Executive Director Exodus International of North America (Exodus is an umbrella organization of Christian ministries around the world) |
| Myth: Evergreen uses torturous shock therapy to make people straight. |
|
In the 1960s and 1970s, some therapists experimented with aversion shock therapies in an attempt to help reorient clients. In these therapies, when a male client was shown pictures of attractive men, he would also receive an electric shock or be caused to vomit, which presumably would produce an aversion for his attraction toward men. Shock therapies were used for a short time for a number of behavioral problems, such as alcohol dependence, drug addiction, and depression. Today, such treatments are considered unethical and are not performed by reputable therapists. Evergreen was organized in 1989 and has never participated in, nor recommended aversion shock therapy. Click here for more detail. |
| Myth: You can encourage same-gender sexual relationships and still be aligned with Church doctrines. |
|
Some LDS groups encourage same-gender sexual relationships, yet pretend to still be completely aligned with the doctrine of the Church. They rationalize that when individuals are attracted to the same sex, they have no hope of a heterosexual marriage and family, and therefore should be allowed same-gender sexual relationships. Some of these groups even maintain a vague association with The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. Evergreen International is the only known organization that supports Church teachings and practices "without reservation or exception." Aligned with the Church? by David Pruden, Executive Director of Evergreen International |
| Myth: If you don't agree with the gay activists, you are a homophobe |
Although activists fight for gay rights, they seem all too eager to limit
the free speech of those who don't agree with their agenda.
Seven Things I Wish Pro-Gay People Would Admit by Bob Davies
Homophobia by Jason Park
|